Split your Income – Save Tax!

Prescribed rate loans are a great tool for family income splitting. By virtue of our graduated tax rates, a family group will save tax if income is shifted from a high rate taxpayer to one or more family members that are in lower tax brackets. For example, a parent in Ontario that is in the top tax bracket and earns $10,000 of interest income will pay approximately $4,600 of tax on the income. If the income was instead earned by a child, without other income, he or she would pay no tax on the income. If the child had $20,000 of other income, then the $10,000 of interest income would attract approximately $2,300 of tax. The annual tax savings via the strategy will depend on the income shifted and the relative tax rates to the parent and child.

So far so good, except that if the parent gifts or loans the underlying investment funds to a child or spouse, then the income earned on the funds will attribute back to the parent. For this reason we must have a plan to avoid the application of the attribution rules. A prescribed rate loan is such a plan – attribution does not apply if the funds are loaned and interest is paid at a rate equal to or greater than the prescribed rate. The good news is that the current prescribed rate is 1%. Further good news is that the 1% will continue to apply in the future even if the prescribed rate increases in future periods.

Welch LLP assists clients in implementing prescribed rate loan arrangements. In many circumstances we use family trusts as part of the plan which leads to added flexibility. The link directs you to an article that provides more insight.

http://www.welchllp.com/publications/1f6f403e7423afbcc4f67a72611954be/Income_Splitting.pdf

- Jim McConnery, CA, TEP
Partner, Welch LLP

Burlington SR&ED Practitioners’ Conference held January 11, 2012

It is unfortunate that there wasn’t more new information introduced at the 15^th annual practitioners’ conference held in Burlington on January 11, 2012.  The most informative portion was at the very beginning when the new Director General of SR&ED, Ms. Susan Betts, discussed the top five SR&ED concerns from claimants and CRA.

The top five concerns of claimants were as follows:
1) CRA staff (specifically RTAs) not qualified to determine eligibility of claims
2) The narrowing of eligibility criteria
3) The increased complexity of forms and processes surrounding SR&ED claims
4) The amount of supporting documents required to prove a claim
5) Lack of consistency as to claim eligibility

The top five concerns of the CRA were as follows:
1) Personal attacks against CRA staff
2) Incomplete claims
3) Cost to claimants of hiring professional firms on a success fee basis
4) The increasing amount of aggressive and unfounded claims
5) Withdrawal of claims when audit requested by CRA

The new Director General then provided some analysis of the two lists.  She stated that she had reviewed the qualifications of the CRA staff and was confident that they were capable and qualified to determine the eligibility of claims.

Ms. Betts indicated that the 2^nd concern of claimants is not actually a narrowing of eligibility criteria but a clarification and definition of what is eligible. She further stated that this clarification is required in order to deal with the claimant concern of inconsistency and the CRA concerns regarding incomplete and aggressive claims.

Ms. Betts noted that the SR&ED program was set up to fund claimant research and development and that, in her opinion, the money being paid to practitioners on a success fee basis was not in line with the program’s intention.

Looking to the future, Ms. Betts indicated that CRA may look at third party penalties in order to deal with the concerns it has regarding incomplete, aggressive and withdrawn claims.  In my opinion, if the CRA were to apply these penalties in appropriate cases it would decrease the compliance time of CRA staff and in theory decrease the time it takes for a legitimate claimant to receive their refunds.

It was a surprise to many that there was little mention of the Jenkins report and no mention of the potential changes stemming from it. When we look at the facts, however, this makes sense as it is the Ministry of Finance that will make the changes. CRA will, of course, need to apply and monitor the changes but they are unlikely to know with any certainty what or when these changes will occur.

At the end of the conference, the lack of new information was disappointing. However, it was nice to talk to CRA advisors and other practitioners; the majority of whom were confident in the fact that the SR&ED program was going to change. After all, Prime Minister Harper stated early on that he would take the suggestions of the Jenkins report very seriously.

The only questions left now is how much the SR&ED program will change and when the changes will begin?

Joshua Smith, CA

SR&ED Tax Manager

For more information about SR&ED tax credits, contact Joshua Smith by e-mail at: jsmith@welchllp.com or by phone at: 613.236.9191.

Be Proactive – Earn More SR&ED Tax Credits

Why be a reactive Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) claimant when you can be proactive SR&ED claimant?  By reactive SR&ED claimant, I mean a business that waits until after year end to write and collect all information to complete a valid SR&ED claim.

In these cases, the business often doesn’t know if any of the projects they have worked on throughout the year would qualify for SR&ED credits.  It is at the end of the year that they start to discuss potential advancements they have seen and the obstacles they had to overcome. All of this of course relies on the memory of employees and management, and as we all know, memory can be faulty.

This is why I urge all businesses to take a proactive approach to the collection, documentation and writing of SR&ED claims.  There are a couple of ways to instigate a proactive approach; one approach would be to analyze every new project to determine if there are any potential technological advancements.  Another approach is to have a periodic meeting between employees, management and any other influencers to determine if any technological advancements or obstacles have arisen.  These meetings could be held quarterly, monthly or weekly depending on the type of business.

The meetings do not need to be lengthy or highly detailed. The idea is to capture new advancements or obstacles that are occurring in the workplace and determine whether or not they could be considered an eligible SR&ED project.  After the meetings, it would be ideal that an individual involved with a particular advancement or obstacle provides further documentation of the work to date.

There are numerous benefits to proactive documentation including:

• Higher quality information (not relying on memory)
• Capture of more SR&ED projects
• Capture of more cost related to the projects
• Better documentation available if a CRA review is requested
• Ability to direct funds to qualifying projects
• Earlier completion of the technical report allowing for earlier filing

I know it is not always possible to document everything proactively but with a little bit of training, organization and effort any business could adopt a proactive system that would hopefully provide a more efficient and larger SR&ED claim.

Joshua Smith, CA

SR&ED Tax Manager

For more information about SR&ED tax credits, contact Joshua Smith by e-mail at: jsmith@welchllp.com or by phone at: 613.236.9191.

2012 Predictions

With 2011 in the “books”, what can we expect in 2012? Hopefully some stability will return to the economy, but, I would not count on it. With my financial bias in mind here are a few predictions:

1. Access to capital, particularly early stage companies that present the most risk and biggest opportunity, will continue to be a challenge. However, 2012 will be a transition year where new sources of capital will emerge and renewed interest in investing. 2013 and 2014 are the years where we will see funding flowing.
2. M&A activity will be steady or increase as companies with strong balance sheets struggling to grow revenue capitalize on the challenges mid market companies have to compete in the global economy. The acquisitions of mid market companies will provide liquidity to investors that will fuel the flow of funds beyond 2012.
3. Government rationalization of spending will put pressure on government incentives resulting in changes in 2012 that will impact 2013 and beyond. Lobby now for those incentives you believe should continue.
4. US accounting standard setters will agree to not adopt International Financial Reporting Standards and continue to maintain their own set of accounting standards.
5. The Canadian accounting professions will merge into one Canadian accredited accounting designation.

Pricing pressures will continue in 2012 as companies focus on protecting their bottom lines. To compete effectively, goods and services will need to be priced competitively and offer tangible benefits.

- Bryan Haralovich, CA, CPA (Illinois)
Assurance Partner
Welch LLP